I am the son of a United States Air Force sergeant who was born on an Air Force base near Tokyo, Japan. Raised in a Christian home, my mother and father transported my three siblings and me in our 1969 beige Volkswagen bus to three Sunday morning services. After lunch and afternoon nap, they took us to Sunday evening service. We attended Bible study on Tuesday, went to mid-week service on Wednesday, and sang at choir rehearsal on Thursday. On Friday, we had family fun night. On Saturday, we ate pancake breakfast in the morning and cleaned the house and worked in the yard in the afternoon. Then it was back to church on Sunday as we started that regimen all over again.
When we weren’t in the church, we attended prayer meetings, church seminars, and conventions. My parents exposed us to the some of the most prominent ministries of the 1970s, such as Corrie Ten Boom, Jamie Buckingham, Kenneth Copeland, Kathryn Kuhlman, John Osteen, Derek Prince, Oral Roberts, Jimmy Swaggart and David Wilkerson.
We read the Holy Bible as a family and had family Bible studies. We prayed as a family. We were also taught to read, study and pray individually. Secular music was unacceptable in our house. My mother even screened contemporary Christian music to make sure it was scriptural and spiritually edifying. Continue reading→
An Open Letter to Monroe County Republican Leaders and Anyone who’s Sick of the Corruption
January 5, 2015
About a month ago, Republican leaders, elected officials and petition passers received an anonymous letter outlining several issues that freedom-loving Republicans in the Rochester area despise about our out-of-control County Chairman Bill Reilich, who runs our once beloved Republican Party as a farm team for the Democrats.
The anonymous letter from the Coalition of Republican Leaders listed exhibits A to I, each showing another instance of alleged betrayal to the cause of the Republican Party. For those who haven’t read this letter, here’s a brief synopsis.Continue reading→
The Republican way is about principle, and what we are seeing is people fighting to obtain or keep power and prestige. We will not be silent.
In NY State’s 138th district, Peterson Vazquez is running against Democrat Assemblyman Harry Bronson on the Republican line. Peterson came here LEGALLY from Puerto Rico years ago and was raised in a Godly home of meager means. Peterson, like many, went through a time of rebellion and dropped out of school, but he overcame it all. He went on to serve in the Army, worked as a tax collector, witnessed first-hand how corrupt the government is, became a conservative Christian and has now chosen to serve the public again by running for the Assembly.
This is an office that is the closest to the people. His desire is to give the people a voice. His values were formed in the church and not by the party puppet masters who call the shots and force their members to play the game. However, having principles has become a problem when it comes to getting support from local Republican Party, run by County Chairman and Greece Town Supervisor Bill Reilich.
It seems that Peterson would get better treatment from the Republicans if he were coming across the border coughing out drug-resistant TB or if he were a gang member. There’s a not-so-secret agreement in Monroe County between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party- the Democrats get control of the city of Rochester, and the Republicans get to control the county. Because Chairman Bill Reilich doesn’t seem to want to know about Republican minorities, minorities are taken for granted by the Democrats and fully ignored by the Republican Party.
This agreement also allows the parties to use the Independence Party to protect incumbents from challengers. The Independence party has become an incumbent-protection racket for the two main parties to divvy up the elected positions. First they agree who’s on the party line, and then they pass petitions with Democrats and Republicans on those same petitions.
This wouldn’t be a bad thing if only the Independence Party members were doing this, but the County GOP is apparently having Republican County workers pass petitions for this party. Peterson Vazquez wanted to get on the Independence Party line because politicians have been convinced that it’s almost impossible to win in this county without being on this third line. Upon initially inquiring with the County GOP, Peterson was told that Harry Bronson was already on the line, even though petitions hadn’t been passed.
When he told his campaign manager that he wanted to get petitions signed to force a primary for the Independence Party, he discovered that she, as a county worker, couldn’t pass those petitions because she was already obligated to pass petitions with the pre-determined victors Harry Bronson and Andrew Cuomo on them. You read that right. Even though she’s a Republican, she had to pass petitions to get Democrats onto the incumbent-protection party line.
After weighing the situation, Peterson told her that she couldn’t be his campaign manager if she was going to be passing petitions for his opponent. Even after asking headquarters if she could pass them in a different district, where Harry Bronson wouldn’t be on her specific petition, they told her no. She was obligated to pass petitions for Harry Bronson, who is a co-sponsor of the NYS GENDA Bill, which has been dubbed as the “Transgender Bathroom Bill” and as the “Big Pedophile Agenda Bill.” New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms has a position paper on this bill.
This bill has won 65% of the vote in the Assembly, and it failed by only one vote in the State Senate. While the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act pretends to be a gay rights bill for transgenders, it is really a bill that gives rights and access to perverts, pedophiles and rapists. This is another Pedophile Agenda effort to normalize pedophilia using the Gay Agenda as a front. It’s so heinous that even gays should find this offensive, but, for some reason, they support this bill whole heartedly, hopefully out of sheer ignorance.
When it was proposed that Peterson’s campaign manager decide not to pass the petitions, she indicated that she felt that her job would be in jeopardy if she didn’t. While it may not be illegal, it is definitely a problem that the GOP Chairman allegedly forces county workers to pass petitions for radical liberals, even though it violates their consciences. Peterson had to let her go.
He picked up another campaign manager and passed petitions to force a primary on “an opportunity ballot” to get on the Independence line. After weeks of gathering signatures, they took them to the Board of Elections. The petitions were all thrown out for a minor mistake. Neither the Republican representative Peter Quinn nor his Republican underling even bothered to advise Peterson on how to avoid making this mistake or on how to fix it before the petitions were turned in.
While there may have been some little technical reason that these men couldn’t have advised Peterson of this minor omission, do we really believe that a Republican Party that allegedly forces county workers to pass petitions for Democrats, can’t give a Republican challenger a little advice? It’s as if these Republicans on the Board of Elections had been given a directive regarding Peterson’s challenge- ensure that he loses at all costs.
Why is the Republican Party, funded with donations of people with principles, seemingly forcing county workers to pass petitions to protect the incumbency of Democrat Harry Bronson who co-sponsors a bill that does everything it can to empower sexual degenerates? Harry Bronson’s bill, which literally aids and abets perverts, pedophiles and rapists, defines the War on Women. Shame on the Monroe County Republican Party.
If you believe that women and girls need to be protected from predators, donate, volunteer and vote for Peterson Vazquez. Otherwise keep giving money to the Monroe County GOP that aids and abets Harry Bronson.
Peterson is not running to play the ruling-class establishment’s game. He is running because he is a great example of the American Dream and wants to be a public SERVANT, give the people a voice, clean up the culture of corruption in Albany, help strengthen the economy, protect the Constitution of the United States and help people have the opportunity for upward mobility. This is why The Frederick Douglass Foundation has decided to back Peterson.
The Frederick Douglass Foundation of New York endorses both voting for Peterson Vazquez and voting against Harry Bronson- which ever makes you more comfortable.
But Even the Republican Establishment seems to be working harder to defeat him than they are to actually help other Republicans get elected. With this overt and obvious lack of help from the party, you can rest assured that, if elected, Peterson will answer to a higher power. Wouldn’t that be a breath of fresh air?
It is time to show the establishment the voice of the people matters more than back room deals.
[plulz_social_like width=”350″ send=”false” font=”arial” action=”like” layout=”standard” faces=”false” ]
—- (The FDFNY would like to thank the Rochester City GOP for supporting Peterson. We are sorry that everyone in our party does not see his value.) You can Support Peterson by sharing this article & Donating HERE or
Some in the Republican Party are bailing on what we stand for in favor of power, money and prestige, and we have two choices: condone it (be silent) and move on, or have the courage to speak out. We have weighed the various pros and cons of being strong, courageous advocates. No one likes a weak advocate, and those who hate truth will also hate us. That is okay.
People will ask: All this over an assembly race, is it worth it? And we say YES! An Assemblyman is one of the closest public servants and voices of the We the People.
Your Servant In Christ, Chaplain Ayesha Kreutz
President of The Frederick Douglass Foundation of NY I have one great political idea. . . . That idea is an old one…..The best expression of it, I have found in the Bible. It is in substance, “Righteousness exalteth a nation; sin is a reproach to any people” [Proverbs 14:34]. This constitutes my politics – the negative and positive of my politics, and the whole of my politics. . . . I feel it my duty to do all in my power to infuse this idea into the public mind, that it may speedily be recognized and practiced upon by our people. ~ Frederick Douglass
I started thinking about all the solutions to the problems in America that we come up with but that go no where because, too often, our society fails to execute good solutions simply because it doesn’t actually understand the problems. Then, a while back, on the last page of National Review On Dead Tree, Mark Steyn had a column called “Sharia’s Protector.” In it, Mark Steyn reprised a story, one he’s recounted numerous times in the last decade, on Sir Charles Napier of Great Britain. During colonial times, General Napier was working in British-occupied India, and he was being told about Sutee. This is a Hindu custom where, upon the death of a man, his widow is then burned upon his funeral pyre. In response to the question of whether this will happen while he was in charge, General Napier didn’t get all multiculturally squishy and ask if he can witness this great tradition as if he were on some cultural exchange program.
In Mark Steyn’s words, General Napier instead responded: “You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: When men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.”
These days, this is what we have too little of: Cultural confidence. Without the confidence in our culture, we will loose it. And that is what is happening on a daily basis. We are losing our great American culture because those who’d destroy America are now teaching our children, and now we are going to further federalize this indoctrination system by implementing Common Core. Our government is purposely teaching America’s children that America was founded by evil people and that it is indeed evil as a result. Liberals always sing “The children are our future.” What kind of future are these children going to allow us to have after they’ve been taught to hate us?
On the other hand, we’ve heard all our lives that America is the greatest country in the world. Well, which is it? If America is the greatest, then wouldn’t that suggest that our culture is the greatest as well? – In the words of Sarah Palin, “You betcha.”
And that’s where the Frederick Douglass Foundation comes in. We aren’t infected with the multi-culti tendency to pretend other cultures are better than that of America’s and thus allow our own culture to be watered down and soaked in shame over some of the bad things that happened in history. Bad things happen. Our goal is to edify, educate, agitate and empower people.
But let’s consider the left’s method of bringing down America. The Left runs the Democrat Party today, and has no doubt infiltrated the Republican Party, just as the liberals have infected the church. It’s no secret to any of us that liberal/progressives are trying to destroy America in just about every way. They’re coming at us from 360 different directions, 24-7. It is up to us to Stand on the truth of God’s Word in our dilligent efforts of taking back our party. The Republican Party has been shamed into cowering and biding its time rather than exhibiting the cultural confidence of General Napier. So it is up to we conservatives: Tea Party Patriots and Libertarians, who are on board the freedom agenda to CONSERVE that which is great about America and its founding. It is Constitutional Conservatism that unites us.
We need to go over the heads of the liberal infiltrated institutions. The Obama Administration is filled with something FDF member Mack Rights calls Bureaucratic Sclerosis – BS for short. If the Bureaucratic tentacles of government actually worked, there’d be no excuse to make them larger, and because of government’s desire to grow, bureaucratic tentacles are created almost always with the knowledge that inevitable failure will be rewarded with largesse. We need to realize this and go over their heads. We need to educate our children outside this insidious governmental system because whole generations are being fed lies upon lies.
So, first I’m going to share with you some foundational principles that you can take to battle in the debate on behalf of conservatism in minority communities. Then I will help you build a method of outreach that won’t be mocked and ignored but that will be appreciated more than you can imagine. Too many of the outreach efforts in the inner cities are rebuffed because Republicans have no idea about how to talk with minorities. The rest are just non-existent because the Republicans ignore the inner city and showing up is half the battle and I mean that literally. I could educate you for an hour just on that subject alone. Anyway,
THE FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES
The left tries to convince children that The Founding Fathers were evil because they founded a nation on slavery. The Frederick Douglass Foundation teaches how this is incorrect. Slavery existed before the nation did, and it happened to exist here on the land where our nation was founded. Just as Frederick Douglass was born a slave, Thomas Jefferson was born a slaveholder. At the time, the black man was considered property, and his freedom, if he did have it, was fraught with peril. With that in mind, we should give our Founding Fathers some latitude. Upon the issuance of the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, our Founding Fathers had decided to risk their lives, their fortunes and their honors to throw off the colonial yolk of Great Britain. Ending slavery simultaneously would have been a logistical nightmare that would have all but ensured failure in the Revolutionary War to come.
However, many of the Founding Fathers were indeed anti-slavery. They just weren’t in charge of their own nation, which is why we fought a Revolutionary War. Nonetheless, even slaveholder Thomas Jefferson included wording in the Declaration that would establish a set of bedrock principles that would later necessitate the abolition of slavery- that all men are created equal with the God-given inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
President Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican President, would later incorporate these principals in the Gettysburg Address. “Four score and twenty years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Five Score years later, Martin Luther King jr would allude to these words again in the lesser known parts of his “I Have Dream Speech.”
Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.
A paragraph later.
In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the “unalienable Rights” of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Even Martin Luther King, Jr. knew he stood upon the shoulders of great men, and he wasn’t going to ignore that simply because of the color of their skin. But how often do you hear that portion of the speech?
So while the nation’s founding didn’t perfectly coincide with the new world’s shedding of the sin of slavery, it was indeed founded as a nation that would absolutely need to abolish slavery if it were ever to live up to the principles upon which it was founded. The nation wasn’t founded so the white man could enslave the black man. That was already happening. The nation was actually founded in a way that would necessitate the end of slavery.
But how often do we hear the story told like that? Not very often, I’m sure. And that’s the problem.
We’ve lost our cultural confidence so much that we are either too afraid to stand up for our nation’s founding or are unable to do so for lack of real historical context- thanks to the left’s takeover of the institutions of course. This is where we come in with program events like David Barton’s American History in Black and White or Seminars to teach you how to systematically engage people who have never heard or considered these truths before.
It’s a chicken and the egg story. America didn’t create slavery with it’s founding, but it did indeed adopt the principles in it’s founding that would later be used to eliminate slavery. How can that founding be considered evil? Keep that in mind when confronted with the left’s arguments for redefining marriage. The meaning of marriage came from God. It existed, like slavery, before the Founding of America. Does using government to destroy the Biblical sacrament of marriage by changing its meaning and thus rendering it meaningless serve society in the same way that eliminating slavery did? Only a leftist liberal/progressive mindset would consider marriage akin to slavery. As a black woman I can tell you this is very offensive.
And now, I want to refer back to the so-called fact that, at our nation’s founding, the black man was considered property. He wasn’t a full human. I understand that the 3-5ths clause was there to keep the pro-slavery vote down because slaveholders were only able to get 3-5ths a vote for every slave they owned instead of a full vote, thus keeping the representation for slaveholding states down. I understand that this was to eventually help the anti-slavery movement defeat the pro-slavery movement democratically. But, when you’re the person only considered 3-5ths, it really doesn’t matter the reason. Just ask those who have been denied personhood in the past, the Jew, the slave, the disabled, Indians or the pre-born child today.
When a man isn’t considered a person but rather property, it is easier for other men to beat, whip, rape, lynch, slaughter and exploit that man. And with that in mind, I want to give a brief overview of one of the things that we at the Frederick Douglass Foundation are working on. We call it the Black Personhood Initiative. We are working with other pro-life organizations to engage inner city pastors throughout the state to help get legislation introduced in New York that would establish personhood at conception. At conception, the DNA blueprint is developed and establishes a unique person. Considering the pre-born baby a person makes it harder to commit abortion on that baby.
This is not about legislatively outlawing abortion. It’s about changing the culture. Once you have enough support and votes to make a constitutional amendment pass it really is not needed anymore. Presently, we have $12,000 worth of
www.Aminotachild.com Visit us and sign the statement of concern
educational commercials running on a daily basis telling the truth about the evil beginnings of the Democrat Party’s institution of abortion in the Rochester area.
While we desire to define all pre-born babies as persons, we call it the Black Personhood Initiative to help draw attention to the racist aspects of abortion. Democrat politicians won’t be able to sign on to this initiative simply because abortion is their most sacred of all of their unholy sacraments, but aren’t you all looking forward to their explanations as to why they won’t sign onto a piece of legislation that defines a black baby as a person? How will those arguments sound in the inner city?
This is the kind of civil rights movement that can help start a good conversation, which can lead into teaching the real history of the Democrat Party in America.
After the black man was freed from slavery, there were still efforts to deny him personhood. The Democrat Party started the KKK to help keep freed blacks in line. We all know that, but we don’t often enough remind our liberal friends that they vote for the party of slavery, segregation, the KKK and now the black genocide of abortion. The liberals never apologize for that, but they love to call us racists. We need the cultural confidence to stand up to anyone calling us a racist. Liberal arguments are weak and fully ignorant of reality.
Share this with your liberal friends when they try to win a debate on the cheap by calling you a racist.
Charles Darwin came up with the theory that we evolved from apes in order to argue that the black man was inferior to the white man because he more resembled the ape from which he supposedly evolved. I don’t care if liberals think they evolved from monkeys. It helps explain why they act like animals. But as for me, I was made in the image of God. The liberals want to teach children that, as one more generation away from the apes, they are superior to their parents. But my children understand that I am one generation closer to the first humans created by God. One generation closer to perfection.
But let me get back to my point. Charles Darwin’s cousin Sir Francis Galton is considered the father of eugenics. Galton made his money by trading slaves, and he used his cousin’s evolution theories to argue for the elimination of the black man from society. The American Eugenics movement spawned Planned Parenthood and the Nazi Death camps. Planned Parenthood was founded to help remove what Margaret Sanger considered “weeds” from society. She was referring to preborn black babies. If they couldn’t kill them on the streets, they’d convince the blacks to kill themselves in the Democrat-Party approved abortion-mill death chambers. They’d kill that black baby in the womb.
Knowing that Planned Parenthoods are strategically located in the inner cities where they will more successfully pick off minorities, according to the original racist eugenics plan, ask your progressive friends why they never complain that it’s racist when white suburban girls are so often forced to drive to the ghetto to kill their baby? If the Democrats really believed in equal distribution of services, why aren’t they complaining about the lack of abortion mills in white-dominated suburbs? We know the answer, but let the liberal try to figure that one out. Let’s see your liberal friend argue their way out of that one. [What kind of equality is that? If not racist]
Keep this in mind too. The company that made Zyclon-B, the gas that the Nazis used to kill the Jews, also makes RU-486- the chemical abortion pill. Today in America, 1,200 black babies are killed every day in abortion mills.
According to the Tuskeegee Institute, in 86 years, the Democrat Party’s KKK lynched and killed about 3,600 blacks. Today, the Democrat Party’s abortion-mill archipelago kills as many blacks every three days as the KKK killed in 86 years.
In the 40 years since Roe, while blacks represent only 12% of the population, they represent over 35% of all abortions committed in America. It’s much easier to understand why I’m a black Conservative woman when the connection is made between racist motivations behind slavery, segregation, the Democrat Party and abortion.
Like Frederick Douglass, I will not yield to the lefts’ determined efforts to culturally wussify America into a Third World Nation of non-persons devoid of cultural confidence because they allowed their culture to be destroyed, one aspect after another. I refuse to be forced into victimhood and have my motivation stolen by those who’d love nothing more than to skim off the wealth redistributed to me through what they call entitlements. While this method of cultural oppression might not be the same as slavery, it is still oppression.
Keep that in mind during the establishment’s coming efforts to legalize the illegal immigrants. Corporate America thinks it will be cheaper to import cheap and subsidized labor to replace American jobs than to send those jobs overseas. The result is the same though. Americans lose jobs, wages go down, more people become jobless and poor, the Democrats gain voters by handing out government goodies. The Republicans want the illegal immigrants to work and not vote, while the Democrats want them to vote and not work. Well, when you can vote your way out of actually having to work, what do you think will happen? Maybe if the Democrats hadn’t aborted over 55 million babies in the last 40 years, we wouldn’t need foreigners to do the jobs that Americans can’t afford to do at the low wages offered to the illegal-alien slave-wage workforce. Goes to show you, the battle between good and evil never changes, just the players do.
And that’s what we need to keep in mind when reaching out to those in the inner cities. First, we need to stop telling them how great tax cuts are. People live in the inner city because they don’t have enough money not to. They don’t pay taxes. Tax cuts are for those who’ve already escaped. However, we should talk pocketbook politics. We need to explain why the Democrat Party’s nonsensical faith in the pagan religion of global warming is increasing the costs of diapers, food, gas and heating their homes. Government-created inflation is the easiest way to raise taxes without having to vote on it. Ronald Reagan used to remind us that that was Lenin’s argument.
But even more important are cultural issues.
We have become cultural wusses. People in the inner city are much more culturally conservative than most moderates who are too afraid of those icky conservative pro-lifers. Their lives are more closely touched by the lack of two-parent homes, people in jail, on drugs, getting AIDS. They are more personally affected by the Democrat Party’s efforts to destroy the black family by taking away the welfare from black women who get married. We need to propose a welfare reform that won’t strip welfare recipients of the safety net if they get married. The Democrats want the women to remain single because single women treat the government like it’s her sugar daddy. But, if she doesn’t lose the security blanket when getting married, she will more likely take the risk of doing so- the risk of exchanging a government check for that of a man who might not always have a job. This is better for the kids. Children who grow up without a father are more likely to end up in jail, get addicted to drugs and to become gang members. It’s as simple as that. People in the inner city know this, but the system encourages them to ignore it. And the Republicans are nowhere to be found, like an absentee father. We need to be the party arguing for a change in the rules for the system.
Right now, the system is less a safety net and more a spider web.
Now it’s true, not all folks in the inner city are culturally conservative, but those who go to church regularly are very much so. Nonetheless, we’re running out of time. The generation of black folks who were around when the vast majority of blacks were Republicans is quickly dying off. We need to encourage them to pass the truth to anyone who will listen. And a lot of folks in the inner city are much more religious than those outside. That’s where we can relate, and it’s much better than pretending all we care about is tax cuts.
Furthermore, schools in the inner city are horrendous. The graduation rates for black boys in Rochester is 9%, and the rate of functional illiteracy of all students who do graduate is around 50%. We are fast tracking these kids to a life of crime and penitentiaries. Parents care about their kids, they want better for them but see no end or hope in sight, trying to fight the system alone. The blame needs to be placed right at the feet of the Democrat Party and its teachers unions, who have run the education system for the last 30 plus years. We on the other hand are sitting on one of the most slept on and winnable issues, School Choice. We should be out there fighting for charter schools, homeschooling, vouchers and freedom from unionized institutions. That’s the plantation, and it’s the Democrats keeping them there.
Furthermore, Republicans have to stop being cowering wimps every time some liberal calls us homophobic or racist or bigots.
It doesn’t matter what we do, they’re going to call us that regardless. When some liberal hoity toytie chick calls you a homophobe, your first reaction should be a dismissive laugh. She’ll be like, “Well, I never. Listen here you homophobe. I take myself seriously. Where do you get off laughing at me?” Then your response has to be, “Oh, no! You called me a homophobe. I’ve never been called that before.” Then laugh at her again and say: “The term homophobe is the argument every one of you progressives use after realizing that you’ve lost the debate.” That’ll shut her up and remind her she lost the debate. The same goes for being called a racist or an Islamophobe. Don’t let the left use these terms to win a debate on the cheap. They can’t win without simple arguments used to shut down debate. In fact, liberals can’t debate anything. Look at Al Gore. His unwillingness to debate anyone is not a sign of confidence but an admission that he’s a coward.
It’s time to stand up to these simpletons. They can’t debate, and like CS Lewis wrote of the devil, “Above all, liberals cannot stand to be mocked.” Mock em and mock em loud, with the Cultural Confidence of an unashamed American.
And with that, I want to leave you with a bit from Chapter 10 of Frederick Douglass’ first autobiography, Narrative of the Life. Frederick Douglass had defied his master over and over in his pursuit of learning to read and write, and his master finally sent him off to Mr. Covey for a year. Mr. Covey was known for being so abusive that he was able to break slaves for other holders. Six months into his stay, Douglass described his mental state thusly:
“Mr. Covey succeeded in breaking me. I was broken in body, soul, and spirit. My natural elasticity was crushed, my intellect languished, the disposition to read departed, the cheerful spark that lingered about my eye died; the dark night of slavery closed in upon me; and behold a man transformed into a brute!”
Days later, after Frederick made a last-ditch effort at being freed from this crazy oppression, Mr. Covey came to beat Frederick as punishment. Douglass wrote, “As soon as I found what he was up to, I gave a sudden spring, and as I did so, he holding to my legs, I was brought sprawling on the stable floor. Mr. Covey seemed now to think he had me, and could do what he pleased; but at this moment- from whence came the spirit I don’t know- I resolved to fight; and, suiting my action to the resolution, I seized Covey hard by the throat; and as I did so, I rose.”
Frederick and Covey fought for over two hours, but Frederick Douglass had in the end won. He wrote: “The whole six months afterwards, that I spent with Mr. Covey, he never laid the weight of his finger upon me in anger. He would occasionally say, he didn’t want to get hold of me again. ‘No,’ thought I, “you need not; for you will come off worse than you did before.’”
That’s the kind of confidence we need take inspiration from. The left is attacking us from every direction, destroying all of our institutions and the family unit. And too many Republicans refuse to stand up to this onslaught. It is up to us. We are the last holdouts. If we fail to preserve the elements in our Constitution that guarantee us our rights and instead allow the left to interpret these rights as rights of the government to control us, there will be no more freedom. We are already being turned into debt slaves as our government continues to borrow some 40 cents of every dollar it spends. We must not accept the dominance of the Karl Rovian Republican Squish assembly line.
History is on our side, and it is our job to conserve what’s great about America. Trickle Down Government doesn’t preserve freedom. It destroys it.
A lot has changed in the 150 years since the Emancipation Proclamation. Despite the rhetoric from many liberals’ mouths that “nothing has changed”, we have a president of mixed racial lineage in the White House. From slavery to the presidency, many barriers have been overcome since President Abraham Lincoln issued a monumental declaration that changed the course of history.
Now, it seems, the Democrat party wants to simply change, or rather revise, history. The Democrat National Committee recently created a website, www.votingrightsmatter.org, touting the GOP’s “threat” to voting rights. Never mind, it was the Republican party that introduced and passed the 15thAmendment, guaranteeing the right to vote regardless of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude”. Democrats voted unanimously against the landmark bill. This microsite was launched to coincide with the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.
The Radiance Foundation calls out the Democrat Party’s blatant dishonesty about America’s Civil Rights struggle.
This weekend, Al Sharpton and a host of pro-abortion, union, Black Nationalist, and gay rights groups (who all adamantly support the discrimination against the unborn) will march on Washington to “commemorate” the historic original event. The Democrat party, once the party of the dehumanizing institution of slavery, is now (unapologetically) the party of the dehumanizing industry of abortion. NARAL, NOW, Black Women’s Health Imperative, Feminist Majority Foundation, and Planned Parenthood arepartners in this deviated effort of “civil rights”. (I can’t help but laugh at the logo included onSharpton’s website for Jesse Jackson’s RAINBOW PU$H COALITION. Apparently, their web designer didn’t notice they snagged an altered, but accurate, version of the logo.) Sharpton is no Martin Luther King. MLK’s dream didn’t envision freedom through governmental dependency, redefining marriage, generational poverty, epidemic fatherlessness, transgendered bathrooms, racial division, less religious liberty, and over 55 million aborted. Preaching victimhood and intolerance, this “anniversary” event sadly will not reflect the greatness that occurred 50 years ago. Even Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, expressed that she can’t have anything to do with Sharpton’s event because it has little to do with the principles that her uncle stood and died for.
Voting rights do matter. Civil Rights do matter. But truth matters even more.
It’s one thing to have a two-party system where there are deep ideological chasms between the two
Democrat Party makes outrageous claims about Civil Rights history on their official website from 2005-2011.
parties. It’s quite another to have one party falsely, and absurdly, claiming the mantle of the other. There’s no mention, throughout the Voting Rights site, that Lincoln was a Republican, or that Republicans abolished slavery, or that Republicans were the ones to protect blacks’ civil rights and oversee the Reconstruction of the South (although ending, tragically, in Republican President Hayes and the Democrat party’s deal to withdraw all federal troops from the South), or that Republicans were the ones who overwhelmingly passed the 19th Amendment. It was Republicans, thanks to the 14thAmendment, who made people of my complexion, American. Yes. These are inconvenient truths for the Democrat political machine whose media and university “academic” allies help them reshape the Democrats’ past.
From 2005-2011, Democrats.org had the audacity to claim: “…we’ve worked to pass every one of our nation’s Civil Rights laws…On every Civil Rights issue, Democrats have led the fight.” The Radiance Foundation has created a Civil Rights Timeline factsheet that exposes how absurdly false this is. The quote needs to be filed under the ‘lie of the century’.
It was Democrats who passed every “black code” and Jim Crow law further dehumanizing recently emancipated slaves. The Civil Rights Act of 1871, known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, was passed by the GOP and unanimously voted against by Democrats. This act sought to end the terrorist violence and murder by the KKK of black and white Republicans. Nothing says voter suppression like a cross burning in your yard or a lynching. But the Democrat party, desperate to rewrite its DNA of racial division and oppression, has created a scapegoat for its own failures—the Republicans.
Even anti-lynching legislation, such as Republican Leonidas Dyer’s 1918 bill, couldn’t get Democratsupport. In 1922, the Republican-controlled House passed the anti-lynching bill only for the legislation to die in the Senate because Democrats wouldn’t allow a vote. Lack of political fortitude allowed the bill to languish for years, with Congress failing to pass such vital legislation to protect American citizens from such heinous scare tactics.
VotingRightsMatter.org is just another, albeit milder, scare tactic painting the GOP as the party that wants to take away our precious right to vote.
Voter ID laws, far from the poll taxes, literacy tests and violence of the Democrat party, actually protect our right to vote. In states where Voter ID laws have passed, minority voting has only increased. In Indiana and Georgia, for instance, voting among black voters increased 8% and 6%respectively. The ACLU, in a failed effort to sue the state of Georgia for alleged “voter suppression”, had its case dropped by a federal judge. Why? Because the ACLU couldn’t produce one single black voter who was unable to vote due to Georgia’s new Voter ID law.
We’ll hear a lot about voter suppression during this weekend’s event. Though liberals won’t make the common sense connection, abortion is the ultimate form of voter suppression. Imagine the political power of the black community that hasn’t been robbed of over 15 million voters, violently eliminated before birth.
Not one mainstream media outlet has taken the DNC’s historical trip of fantasy to task. Not one major news network has challenged their blatantly false Voting Rights Matter presentation.
It’s up to us. We can choose to seek and know the truth, or continue to be manipulated by those with a perpetual agenda to be re-elected and in control. We can choose to be the victims that liberals so desperately need, or the victors who reject today’s self-proclaimed “civil rights” movement. We need to know the difference—red, white, black or white—between being empowered and being fooled by those in power.
The current Republican lieutenant governor of Virginia, Bill Bolling, immediately criticized his party for nominating Jackson, saying it will feed the “image of extremism” in the party.
Some 25 years ago, I changed my life.
A visit inside a church opened my eyes to the destructive life I was living, financed by welfare checks generously provided by American taxpayers.
I got off welfare, went to work, got politically active and became a Republican. I didn’t become a Republican because of what the party looked like. I became a Republican because of what the party stood for: individual freedom, traditional values, with a view that government’s role is to protect our freedom at home and abroad.
For the next 25 years, I had to suffer indignities from liberals who could not fathom that a black could be a Republican because she actually embraced these values.
But now, we have a strange turn of events.
Liberals no longer feel on the run like they did in the 1980s and 1990s. They are running the show and they know it. So I hear less from them.
Now the indignities come from inside the party that I embraced 25 years ago.
It was always the Democrats that were about interest group politics.
Now Republicans have somehow concluded that their party’s woes are because it once stood for something. So the game plan is to morph into the Democrats’ stepsister.
Whereas once Republican buzzwords were family and freedom, now it is inclusion. The marching orders, according to the post-election “autopsy” report from the Republican National Committee, is outreach to blacks, Hispanics, gays, women and Asians. It’s now about what the party looks like, not what it stands for.
Christian conservatives, once the answer, are now the problem.
Which gets to Bishop E. W. Jackson.
Bishop Jackson is an outspoken black Christian conservative with a law degree from Harvard. He also was just selected as the nominee for lieutenant governor of Virginia.
Although Republicans are talking about black outreach, it is not, unfortunately, blacks like Jackson that they have in mind.
He is outspoken about limited government and personal freedom, about the importance of family and traditional marriage, and about doing something about the scourge of abortion.
In other words, E.W. Jackson stands for everything that the Republican Party once stood for.
He’s making the Republicans of inclusion squirm.
The current Republican lieutenant governor of Virginia, Bill Bolling, immediately criticized his party for nominating Jackson, saying it will feed the “image of extremism” in the party.
Ronald Reagan used to say that the 11th commandment was to not speak ill of a fellow Republican. That commandment has now been modified to permit it, if that fellow Republican is a Christian conservative.
Certainly, Jackson does not pull punches. But his statements about the government “plantation” are 100 percent true. It’s no accident that trillions of dollars in government programs have had zero impact on black poverty. Black single-parent homes and out-of-wedlock births have tripled since the War on Poverty began in 1965.
A new Gallup poll shows a dramatic shift in American attitudes on traditional morality. Fifty-nine percent now say homosexual relations are acceptable, up 19 points from 2001; 60 percent say out-of-wedlock birth is OK, up 15 points from 2001; 68 percent say divorce is OK, up 9 points from 2001; and 14 percent are OK with polygamy, twice that of 2001.
The economy is sputtering at 2 percent growth, four points below the expected recovery growth rate from a deep recession, and our national debt is now greater than our gross domestic product.
The country needs a bold alternative voice to wake it up. The conservative Ken Cuccinelli-E W Jackson ticket in Virginia is such a voice.
Will their party get behind them or pull the rug out, as it has done to other conservatives in recent races? Will the Republican Party get back to what it once was about, or will it become just another symptom of a nation in decline?
Full Text of Speech for Tea New York April, 13th 2013
By Ayesha Kreutz
Bring a gun to a knife fight.
Good morning. I am Chaplain Ayesha Kreutz, A Tea Partier, An Uncle Tom and the president of the Frederick Douglass Foundation of New York. We are the largest multi-ethnic Christian and Republican Ministry in the nation. We are devoted Christians, proud Americans and active Republicans. That third leg of our three-legged stool is oftentimes hard to admit these days, but we use to first two to motivate our efforts to uphold our obligations to the third.
Thank you for inviting me here to speak today. I am truly honored to be counted among such American Patriots as you all. I pray that you will be edified and enlightened and that the Lord would reign down His Holy fire on us today.
It’s been said that President Obama would like to be to the Democrats the equivalent of what President Reagan was for the Republicans. In understanding the consequences of this desire, one has to first understand what Ronald Reagan was.
It is my opinion that Ronald Reagan was, among other things, an unashamed Christian who served people. He understood focus, strategy, liberty and that what made America great was its founding upon Christian values. In this day in age, in certain company, too many Americans would feel the need to whisper that last part with a sense of shame due to the moral rot that has infested this nation courtesy of the left’s unceasing efforts to undo the Reagan Revolution.
But I am here to proclaim that it is time for us to stop feeling ashamed of being American and of being desirous to live by the values of America’s Founders. These values were INDEED the values of Jesus Christ.
For my libertarian friends who might not be as religious as this speech, please bear with me. This message is for you as well.
In any case, I have indeed said it. The principles that our Founding Fathers put into the Constitution came from my Lord and savior Jesus Christ.
There were no property rights.
There were no rights of the accused.
There was no marriage, 1 man, 1woman, at one time for life.
And there was no right to life.
These rights were left up to the whims of despots and their ability to wield their power. They controlled people and property according to their ability to control by brute force.
Our Founding Fathers not only gave us a Constitution that protected our inalienable rights that were enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, but then further specified our rights in what we conveniently call the Bill of RIGHTS. The Bill of Rights isn’t there to protect the government’s ability to control we the people. Instead, it’s there to protect we the people from the tyrannical whims of a corrupted government gone wild- something of which they fled and foresaw the possibility of again.
Now, In 1811, John Adams wrote: “Religion and virtue are the only foundations, not only of republicanism and of all free government, but of social felicity under all governments and in all the combinations of human society.”
Then in 1816, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, he wrote: “The Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount contain my religion.”
Well that’s interesting. The Ten Commandments, huh? Aren’t those what the liberals consider to be God’s talking points, which the Democrats want to hide from view of every child in America? One must ask why and what are the implications of hiding those Commandments?
In a recent Frederick Douglass Foundation of New York article by Mack Rights, titled “If the Devil Ran a Party,” he did his best C. S. Lewis impression. C. S. Lewis wrote “The Screwtape Letters,” which is a dialogue between a demon coaching his underling demon on how to tempt humans into sin. Mack wrote what he called the Devil’s Ten Commandments to illustrate how much easier it would be for the Democrats to accept the Ten Commandments if they’d been given to man by the devil instead of God.
I’m going to borrow a bit of his writing. Because of time I had to just pick a few to read, but it was very hard to cut some out. They are all good. But you can read the whole thing on our blog just go to www.fdfny.org/blog
And the devil spoke all these words, saying: I am the leader of your government, who brought thee out of the land of freedom and into the house of bondage, where you can read 50 Shades of Grey all day with no inkling of guilt.
1. Thou shalt have no other government force beside me. You no longer need a god. You’ve got me- the one who runs your government. Have faith in your government. Have faith in me. I will supply your needs just enough to make you complacent. For as long as you have no other god but my government.
5. Do Not Honour thy father nor thy mother. Your father was unwilling to give your mother the money to abort you, and I pay your mother not to marry him as she religiously votes for me come election day. Instead, expect them to honour you, for you are equal to them, now that you’ve escaped your mother’s womb. If they spank you or try to correct you, please inform some of my jackboots at Social Services. I’ve got your back my heathen child. You shalt be honoured and revered little heathen one.
6. Thou shalt commit adultery. Think of how revered the Clintons and the Kennedys are. By the way, if you’re a sodomite, get married to other sodomites and sleep around. There’s no point in besmirching your former god’s institution if you aren’t willing to besmirch it in every way possible. Besides, adultery leads to divorce, divorce requires lawyers, and most lawyers give money to Democrats. Oh, and have all the sex outside of marriage you can find energy to have. That’s adultery too, but most of my voters don’t know anything about that. And if a baby results, abort it and run from your responsibility.
8. Thou shalt kill all you want, the old and young alike, but especially the innocent and harmless little ones in your women’s wombs. Abortionists make money and donate to the Democrats. Murderers need lawyers too, and as I’ve said, most lawyers give Democrats money. Feel free to kill children in gun-free zones. It gives we Democrats a huge excuse to pass laws that turn “legal” gun owners into criminals who can then be sent to reeducation camps.
9. Thou shalt bear false witness against thy neighbour. Call him a racist. Call him a bigot. Call him a homophobe. Call him a man. Whatever. I’ll shun him and send him off to sensitivity training camp where my unionized government workers will get paid and then donate their dues money to the Democrat Party.
10. Thou shalt covet thy neighbour’s wife; thou shalt covet thy neighbour’s house; his field, his servant, his maid, his ox, and of course his ass [many Democrats aren’t aware that ass is another word for donkey, which, weirdly enough, is their mascot]. I thrive on class warfare, and there can be no class warfare if people refuse to be covetous of things that others have worked for.
All right. The devil has spoken.
Think about that, and then ask yourself again, why is it that the Democrats despise God’s Ten Commandments? Why is it that they voted to remove God from their platform? And why, at the 2012 Democrat National Convention, did the Democrats boo God? Why is it that their number one most important sacrament is baby sacrifice, or as they euphemistically call it, “choice?” In the wake of unspeakable mass murders performed by mentally unstable young men whose brain chemistries have been altered by psychotropic drugs, why is it that they are focusing on taking guns away from law-abiding citizens rather than focusing on those who are already criminals? They cannot even implement and enforce the laws on the books, yet we are allowing them to make more. Why is it that the veterans who come home from war are forced to take psychotropic drugs in order to get their medical needs covered and are then getting their rights to bear arms rescinded because of the use of psychotropic drugs, which the government mandated in the first place? Why is it that we the taxpayer pay for workers to go out and actively sign people up of for government benefits, which make them dependent upon government, thus stealing their ambition to succeed on their own according to God’s plan? Why is it that the system we call a safety-net is so threatened by something as biblical as marriage causing single mothers to be too afraid of it, lest they lose their welfare benefits if they do something biblical, like get married?
This is not the plan of God, nor of the Founding Fathers who created a system of government that allowed people to live in freedom by the plan of God. This is the plan of someone else. Someone who despises God. And that, my friends, is the country we live in. It is time we recognize, America has crossed the line and are now fighting to awaken the American Spirit and call our fellow men to revival. Each one of us in the room has been called to Stand up and Speak out. We must be unified and focused.
Our president, as a younger man, used to teach a class based on the teachings of Saul Alinsky, whose book Rules for Radicals was dedicated to none other than Lucifer himself. If the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince man that he, the devil, didn’t exist, what is the implication of this wool pulled over some mens’ eyes? If the devil doesn’t exist, there must be no need of God to create the balance. Man without God becomes a god unto himself.
If there IS good and evil, then we have a term to describe that which is NOT good. If there is no right and wrong, what do you call that which isn’t right? If there is no devil and no God, man gets to determine what is wrong and what is right. Whoever is in power gets to determine what is good and what is evil. Right now, that man is the Democrat Party, and the Republicans would rather compromise with that man than call that man’s definition of good and evil what it really is- WRONG.
If God’s Children are silenced from expressing the truth and America Falls what hope is left in the world? Remember God often uses the remnant to accomplish the impossible.
Look, I can’t say with a straight face that the Republican Party’s establishment is good. They are no longer the party of Reagan. They are a party that has been cowed into compromise and unprincipled surrender by a media, a sham educational system, a morally rotten culture, a welfare state that is as tempting as a serpent with an apple in the Garden of Eden and a Democrat Party that profits from the sins of its voters in every way possible. Let me say that again. They profit from the sins of their voters. In fact they encourage sin in the pursuit of more profit. Ironic, isn’t it? They hate capitalism until profiteering from sin means money in their coffers.
The sad thing is, so many of the Christians in this country have been silenced, and their pulpits have been perverted by those trying to win converts to fill the collection plate through the church’s acceptance of sin as normal. But in trying to win converts, they’ve turned those that don’t want to compromise away and sold the souls of their flock to the devil.
And that is what the Republican Party is doing. In trying to go soft on cultural issues, they are losing their Christian base. When the Squishtians, as we at the Frederick Douglass Foundation like to call them, take the pulpit, the Christians stay home. In trying to win over the sinners, they are losing those who don’t want to compromise with sin. A man doesn’t go to church in hopes of finding out that his sins are fine. A man goes to church in search of the fortitude it takes to resist the temptation that leads him into that sin. So hold your pastors accountable, let them know it is time for the church to wake up and arise, it is time she take her rightful place as the head and not the tail.
And I’m sure you’re thinking, if this room were filled with a bunch of black liberals, they’d be calling me an Uncle Tom for being a republican. And they’d be right.
Let me tell you about Uncle Tom, it is not what you think it is. From the book Tom was a slave who had an unwavering faith in Jesus Christ on a plantation where he was told over and over again that there is no God. There’s only your slave master. Does that sound familiar? There is no God. Only your slave master, or only your government. Even in the face of other blacks who’d try to convince him, he refused to give up his faith.
At one point in the story, his master told him to whip another slave woman. He refused. Then the master told some other slaves, who were the slave overseers, to whip him. Their names were Sambo and Quimbo. He took the whippings rather than deny his Lord by whipping another slave. For that, he was whipped nearly to death, and then later, he was indeed whipped to death. And the real life story of Josiah Henson, whom the book was based on, was even more inspiring.
Now, Uncle Tom didn’t have strength inspired by an extra-large slice of government cheese. His strength came from his faith in eternal bliss that his Lord had promised him. Even in the face of death itself, Uncle Tom refused to take on the sins of his master by performing those sins on another for his master. He understood the meaning of live free or die.
I recount the story of Uncle Tom for a reason. Today, as Tea Party People, we are ostracized, defamed, reviled, smeared, spat upon and outright despised. And that’s just from the people in our own party- the Republican Party. Here’s the difference between we true American Patriots and the Squishtians who run our dying party. We actually believe what we say we believe, and it’s not to maintain the power that we don’t have in the first place. It’s as if those, we’re told to entrust the party to, have gone back to their old ways and accepted the role of second fiddle to their liberal “betters.” I don’t know about you, but that’s not good enough for me.
George Washington once said: “The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage of this army (Tea Party), Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission, We have, therefore to resolve to conquer or die“. –
In a recent article in the National Review, titled “Persecution of Christians, then and now,” John O’Sullivan makes an interesting point when he writes: Quote “There is a distinction to be made between martyrdom and persecution. A martyr is someone who, confronted with a choice between death and his faith, chooses to undergo death; a victim of persecution is someone who is killed or brutally abused because of his faith without being given a choice.” Unquote. With Obamacare, the only choice we get is Death for the unborn.
Think on that when you consider that our president is mandating that we pay for insurance policies that cover the contraception, sterilization and abortifacient drugs to help our fellow citizens kill their unborn child. Not only is our governing force mandating that we approve of abortion through chemical killing of the innocent, this same governing force demands that we put money into a pot to be used by our fellow citizens who will be encouraged to murder their unborn. Only, they won’t call it murder. They’ve already succeeded in the redefinition of murder as abortion.
This is nothing other than our governing force forcing us to indirectly take part in a sin that God commands us not to do in the eighth commandment, the one that reads: Thou Shalt not murder.
In trying to control the language and the way people think, the liberals are attempting to nationalize the education curriculum with something they call CommonCore. The whole purpose of CommonCore is to create workers out of children who don’t think for themselves because they were never taught to do so. The Communist Chinese, the Soviets, the Khmer Rouge, the VC- they all killed those who could and would think for themselves. The liberals seem to see the benefit of having a population that doesn’t think for itself, so they’re seeking to create it with CommonCore. If you choose to look into this, ignore what the liberal Republicans like Jeb Bush are saying. Replacing literature with so called non-fiction writing manuals and liberal diatribes for indoctrination does not help to turn a child into a thinking adult- just a mindless worker.
Speaking of not being able to think for oneself, look at what they’re trying to do by legalizing the illegal immigrants. By erasing the distinction between immigrants who followed the law and those who broke it to get here, we aren’t getting rid of the stigma of criminality that an illegal alien wears. We’re actually giving that stigma to the legal immigrants. It’s the socialistic equal distribution of stigma. You don’t reward criminals by stigmatizing law-abiding immigrants. That’s not equality. It’s the redefinition of the word legal. It’s absurdity.
If you’re starting to see a pattern, don’t worry. You’re not a conspiracy nut. You’re just a commonsense citizen lucky enough to be educated before Common Core destroys the creativity and ingenuity of the American mind, which is exactly what it will do if this monstrosity isn’t left on the dung heap of bad liberal ideas, along with Agenda 21 and Obamacare.
Consider the normalization of homosexuality. Look I’m not saying that we shouldn’t love the sinner and hate the sin. However, if homosexuality is normal, that means heterosexuality is abnormal, according to any reading of the definition of the word “normal” in the dictionary.
With the invention of the redefinition of marriage, they are telling us that we must revere the governing force ruled by sinful men over the Word of God, which is what created the institution of marriage in the first place. If the meaning of the Word of God can be changed at the whims of man, doesn’t that, in essence, render the Word of God meaningless? And to enforce this change of meaning, Christians across the country are losing their livelihoods for refusing to work on “gay weddings” through their conscientious objections. Just the other day, it was announced that the Washington State Attorney General filed a lawsuit against a florist for not taking a gay-wedding gig.
Since when in America is it against the law not to work for someone you don’t want to work for? I thought the Emancipation Proclamation took care of that.
This is all in violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. Atheism may not be as recognized a religion as Christianity, but it is still indeed a religion based on a faith. Granted, it’s a devout faith in nothing, but it’s a faith nonetheless. Not only are we losing our ability to live in a country free of government-imposed religion- you know, atheism- but we are losing our ability speak freely about this in dissent.
On top of that, they’re trying to take away our guns. They know and we know, that without the 2nd Amendment nothing is keeping them from taking away our 1st Amendment rights.
Consider this. If Uncle Tom and the slave woman he was supposed to whip had guns, there would have been no whippin’s that day.
Some of you might think that I’m being hyperbolic in comparing the Democrat Party to the slave masters of the Old South, but you’d be wrong. The Democrats ARE the party of slavery, segregation, the KKK, the black genocide through abortion and of socialism, which leads us back to slavery. They’ve never apologized for slavery or owned up to it as THEIR institution. In fact they still have fantasies about running the plantations. They’ve just found new ways to get there. Except this time, they’re not just trying to put only the blacks on the plantation. They’re trying to put us all there- anyone who’s not in the ruling class.
And the ruling class Squishtians like Jeb Bush, John McCain and Lindsey Grahm are helping them every chance they get. Like Sambo and Quimbo, they’re willing to trade their principles for a little plantation comfort- the equivalent of straw underneath their blanket of burlap sacks in the cold of winter. I’m telling you, from personal experience, the government plantation is awful. Don’t go there, and don’t let them put you there. Never give up the fight for freedom.
Yes, I am an Uncle Tom. I will not give in. I will not deny my Lord so that I can give away my freedom to a tyrannical governing force unburdened by the fear of my God whose existence this government despises. I know my history. History and God are on my side. Not on the side of Obama and his government-cheese distributing posse of slave whippers.
Uncle Tom was a true martyr. He chose death over being forced to violate his faith. Sambo and Quimbo, the slaves that whipped Uncle Tom, upon the orders of their slave master, chose comfort over dignity. The problem I have with the Republican Party is that ruling class Republicans are nothing but a bunch of Sambos. Their willingness to compromise with something like the Democrat Party, which I’ve described above, is willingness to compromise with pure evil. Compromising with something so wrong, according to the tenets of the faith upon which this country was founded, is just another way of endorsing that wrongness as legitimate.
I am not a Sambo. I am not a Quimbo.
I am an Uncle Tom.
I will not whip my fellow man in exchange for government cheese.
I will not heed the Borg-like collectivist call that “Resistance is futile.”
When in fact, Resistance is vital.
When the liberals call me an Uncle Tom, what is it that they are saying? They’re saying that they think that I should be whipped by my fellow brothers and sisters for refusing to whip my other fellow brothers and sisters in order to keep them in line.
The Republican Party has a choice. It can be the party of Uncle Tom by standing by their supposed principles, or they can be a party of Sambos and Quimbos who take orders from their Democrat-Party slave masters in exchange for comfort; like invitations to cocktail parties of the rich and famous and conditional power.
We as Tea Party people are all Uncle Toms, unless we decide to give in. And I plead with you: do not give in. Share this message. Keep up the fight. Keep the pressure on the Republican Party. As Sam Adams once said: “It does not take a majority to prevail…. but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men” ~
We must continue to fight for the principles set forth in the platform of the Republican Party and the solutions we know that work. Two things everyone in the room can do it 1) give generously to Tea NY and 2) join your local republican committee, it is time we take back our party, take back our communities and take back our state.
And If we do give in, God forbid, to paraphrase Jonah Goldberg quoting Homer Simpson on the French, we’d be nothing but a bunch of government-cheese-eating surrender monkeys.
To invite Ayesha or another FDF Speaker to your event email us at email@example.com or call (585) 615-9551. Our talks, workshops and events center around various conservative topics. Let us know the audience and topic so we can provide the appropriate message/speaker.
You can make a non-tax deductible donation to us HERE and help me travel the state sharing the message to those who NEED to hear it. We are the boots on the ground needed to turn things around.
” I’m an ex offender trying to stop the next offender ” -Paul McKinley
There’s something very familiar about Illinois GOP congressional candidate Paul McKinley.
i grew up with men like him. In his past criminal life, I’ve opposed those like his previous self all my adult life.
Urban thugs inspired my phrase, ” chocolate Klansmen. “
I also support the few who climb out of the grave of crime and ignorance smothering neighborhoods like the ones he and I grew up in.
His ex con background is getting alot of press, ironically from the same mainstream media otherwise reliably soft on crime.
It seems their embrace of urban rehabilitation stops short of Black men running as Republicans.
To be fair, the Chicago GOP establishment hasn’t recieved him with open arms either.
Herein lies the dilemma.
Inner city reformers like McKinley are representative of life within these Democrat-held areas. While purists balk at his diction, it is the same language spoken daily in an America few Republicans dare visit.
His advocacy against Chicago’s infamous ” Machine ” and support of traditional marriage and gun rights are what the inner city needs to hear more from traditionalists from there.
He can’t be dismissed as a trust fund baby.
He can’t be accused of acting ” too White ” ( a usual Democrat charge ) for such an urban district.
He knows life there with an intimacy few critics or even distant supporters can match. Very rarely do people escape such hopelessness.
In Paul McKinley, America witnesses a truly Hood conservative who has lived the worst of the inner city and now wants to help save it.
Sounds good to me.
Here’s his priceless analysis of Chicago’s ” Machine: ”